NOTRE DAME,INDIANA — A comic strip in the student newspaper at the University of Notre Dame has started the new semester with a harsh lesson.
The three-panel strip appeared Wednesday, the first issue of The Observer after Christmas break.
A talking saw asks, “What is the easiest way to turn a fruit into a vegetable?”
“No idea,” a man responds.
“A baseball bat,” says the saw.
It led to an outcry — locally and from at least one national organization — at how the strip plays on violence against gay people.
The Observer’s editor in chief, student Jenn Metz, professes her and her staff’s outrage.
“I was personally outraged and extremely offended that something of that nature had been printed in our paper — language that has no place at Notre Dame, language that is hurtful to members of our community,” Metz says. “Our written apology is the first step in moving forward.”
Metz is referring to The Observer’s own editorial in Friday’s edition that apologizes for the cartoon. Also, the three Notre Dame seniors who develop the cartoon, known as “The Mobile Party,” write their apology.
Metz says she and her staff are investigating what went wrong. She says she wasn’t there when Wednesday’s edition was put together and didn’t see the comic until it appeared in print.
The university’s president, the Rev. John Jenkins, said this about the strip in a written statement Friday: “The University denounces the implication that violence or expressions of hate toward any person or group of people is acceptable or a matter that should be taken lightly.”
Like many college papers, The Observer is independent. The daily paper is produced on campus, but students are completely in charge of content. They send the paper to the printer and the Internet without a university official peering over their shoulders, Metz says. In its statement Friday, the university says it continues to respect the paper’s independence.
Metz says she and her staff started to respond to the cartoon as soon as it appeared in print — without nudging from the university and before dozens of angry readers wrote or stopped by the paper’s office.
“There’s a larger problem than this specific comic,” says Daniel J. Myers, a sociology professor and associate dean at Notre Dame. He wrote a commentary in Friday’s edition of The Observer titled “How we know our university has failed,” which focuses on the issues surrounding the cartoon.
Myers says there’s a culture that still thinks these sorts of things are funny. He’d like to see more people voice their outrage so that there might be more conversation on the issue.
“I think all of us have a responsibility to respond to this sort of thing,” he says.
Alex Giorgio, a Granger man who is gay, agrees: “If we keep quiet, nothing will change.”
Tricia Wainscott hopes this turns into a learning experience. She suggests “some kind of forum to express actions of hate that have happened to them.”
She is director of the GLBT Resource Center of Michiana, a South Bend nonprofit that offers support and information to people with gender issues. GLBT stands for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender.
Wainscott lives close to the Notre Dame campus and loves the place. But now, she says, the cartoon’s reference to violence raises a question about whether people can feel safe stepping foot there.
“Something like this gives me a strong reason for having protections — so that things like this can’t be seen as a joke,” she says.
She says she gets calls from people who believe that being gay caused them to lose jobs and apartments, and from others who have suffered domestic violence from a gay partner.
Giorgio, who runs the center’s support group for youths who are GLBT or questioning it, adds, “We have to look to lawmakers to be more inclined to add GLBT to workplace discrimination clauses and allow members of the community to have equal rights.”
A blog, apparently run by the comic’s creators, suggested that the strip’s original punch line wasn’t the phrase, “A baseball bat,” but “AIDS.” The punch line was changed. Metz says she’s still seeking answers to whether that was true.
In their apology, the comic’s creators write that they “use the tool characters to emphasize a mindset that we simply find ridiculous.” They write that their strip relies on “shock value” and that “now … we have gone too far.”
A statement from The Observer staff says: “We … are working to contact groups in our community to begin to move forward and help to eliminate language of hate toward others on campus. We will be working over the next several days to publish revised policies, editing processes and staff changes.”
Along with supporting groups that promote peace, love and nonviolence, Metz points out that The Observer has editorialized in the past in support of adding sexual orientation to the university’s nondiscrimination clause.
Asked if the timing was poignant — so close to Monday’s holiday for civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. — Metz said: “There is still a problem of hateful speech in our society. It would be just as hateful if it appeared on any other Wednesday.”
In the university’s statement Friday, it refers to the “Spirit of Inclusion” that it adopted in 1997, saying that it values gay and lesbian members of its community and condemns “harassment of any kind.” It states the university should “consciously create an environment of mutual respect, hospitality and warmth in which none are strangers and all may flourish.
from The South Bend Tribune
*
*
